【AI前沿】Apple says Epic lawsuit shouldn’t reshape App Store rules for all developers

In Apple’s seemingly never-ending lawsuit with Fortnite maker Epic Games over App Store commissions, the iPhone maker is once again fighting a court’s ruling. Its latest tactic? Saying that Epic Games’ beef with Apple over its fee structure shouldn’t lead to an injunction that applies to all developers that publish on the U.S. App Store, including other tech giants like Microsoft and Spotify, which weren’t a part of this particular litigation.“Epic never brought a class action and never attempted to show that enjoining Apple’s conduct against all other developers — like Microsoft or Spotify, who have nothing to do with Epic — was somehow necessary to provide relief to Epic,” reads Apple’s new petition, which asks the U.S. Supreme Court to review the lower court ruling.In the same document, Apple also argues against the Ninth Circuit’s civilcontemptorder over Apple’s compliance with the injunction. The court had ruled that Apple must give developers the right to include links in their apps — links that could direct users to alternative payment options outside of Apple’s own system — if they chose to do so. Apple did permit this as required, but charged fees on those outside purchases, leading to the contempt order.The Ninth Circuit said that charging fees of 27% on external payments defeated the purpose of allowing them — which, well, it did. But Apple is pushing back on specific legal grounds. Its new argument focuses on whether a federal court can hold a party in civil contempt for violating the “spirit” of an injunction when the injunction itself was written in a way that left room for interpretation and said nothing about commissions (i.e., it didn’t specificallyprohibitfees on external purchases, sotechnically, Apple believes it did nothing wrong).Apple has seemingly infinite money to fund its legal battles. The company has been fighting Epic’s original 2020 lawsuit for over five years now with no end in sight.Epic Games criticized Apple’s latest move as “one last Hail Mary to delay a conclusion to this case and avoid opening up the gates to payment competition for the benefit of consumers.”Earlier this month,the Supreme Court rejectedApple’s requestto pauseadditional proceedingsuntil the court could determine whether the sanctions were justified.This week, Epic Gamesannouncedthat Fortnite was back in the App Store globally (save for Australia), because it believes the court is on its side and will not allow Apple’s fee structure to stand as is.TopicsApple,Apps,Commerce,Court,Epic Games,lawsuitWhen you purchase through links in our articles,we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.Sarah PerezConsumer News EditorSarah has worked as a reporter for TechCrunch since August 2011. She joined the company after having previously spent over three years at ReadWriteWeb. Prior to her work as a reporter, Sarah worked in I.T. across a number of industries, including banking, retail and software.You can contact or verify outreach from Sarah by [email protected] via encrypted message at sarahperez.01 on Signal.View BioMay 27Athens, GreeceStrictlyVC Athens is up next. Hear unfiltered insights straight from Europe’s tech leaders and connect with the people shaping what’s ahead. Lock in your spot before it’s gone.REGISTER NOWMost PopularYou can no longer Google the word ‘disregard’Russell BrandomSix search engines worth trying now that Google isn’t really Google anymoreAmanda SilberlingJensen Huang says he’s found a ‘brand new’ $200B market for NvidiaJulie BortSam Altman makes ‘mic drop’ offer to every Y Combinator startupJulie BortIntuit to lay off over 3,000 employees to refocus on AIRam IyerGoogle Search as you know it is overSarah PerezElon Musk has lost his lawsuit against Sam Altman and OpenAITim Fernholz