【AI前沿】Democrats preview how they’d go after the Ticketmaster settlement if they regain power

PolicyEntertainmentAntitrustDemocrats preview how they’d go after the Ticketmaster settlement if they regain powerAnd California’s AG says an even broader breakup of Live Nation is on the table.And California’s AG says an even broader breakup of Live Nation is on the table.byLauren FeinerMay 19, 2026, 8:13 PM UTCLinkShareGiftImage: Cath Virginia / The VergePart OfUSA v. Live Nation-Ticketmaster: all the news on the lawsuit that could take down a giantsee all updatesLauren Feineris a senior policy reporter at The Verge, covering the intersection of Silicon Valley and Capitol Hill. She spent 5 years covering tech policy at CNBC, writing about antitrust, privacy, and content moderation reform.A handful of Democrats called an unofficial hearing on Capitol Hill Monday to slam the Department of Justice’s “trivial” and “pathetic” settlement with Live Nation-Ticketmaster, previewing how they might go after Trump administration antitrust deals if they win back congressional power in November.While the DOJsettlementwith Live Nation, which came one week into trial and with a promise of up to $280 million, received copious pushback, Democrats don’t at the moment have the power in either chamber to set committee agendas. That meant that Monday’s so-called shadow hearing looked different than most official proceedings. Instead of sitting at the elevated seats behind the dais, the lawmakers sat at tables below, eye level with witnesses including California Attorney General Rob Bonta, one of the AGs continuing the fight against Live Nation-Ticketmaster, ousted Trump administration antitrust official Roger Alford, and several entertainment industry players, including a member of the band The Hold Steady. Several artists asked to appear at the forum declined out of fear for their livelihoods, according to House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Jamie Raskin (D-MD), who co-hosted the forum with Senate Homeland Security permanent subcommittee on investigations Ranking Member Richard Blumenthal (D-CT).While their statements won’t be formally entered into the congressional record, the forum gave Democrats a way to publicize their concerns, which included that the DOJ’s deal was the result of undue corporate influence. “This isn’t like some kind of pickup game,” Raskin told reporters. “The corruption permeates the administration so much that we have to start building the record because it’s such an overwhelming task. We will be using the products of all of these shadow hearings to figure out where to go.” As a signal of the significance of the forum, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) delivered opening remarks to kick it off.“The corruption permeates the administration so much that we have to start building the record because it’s such an overwhelming task”The lawmakers pointed to the states’resounding victory in the jury verdictas evidence that theDOJ’s settlementfell far short of what a good faith deal would include, charging it was a result of corruption. On the11-page verdict form, jurors checked “yes” on every question about whether the states proved their claims. The DOJ has stood by its deal as a win for consumers. The deal will still need to undergo a Tunney Act review, which is meant to ensure that it’s in the public interest.Judges are typically loath to reject a settlement, which is why Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) hasproposed legislationto strengthen the standard. But Alford, who wasfired from the DOJandlater spoke outabout opposing lobbyist influence in antitrust deals, said this could be the rare case where the judge may reject the DOJ’s agreement, given that the same judge is now tasked with coming up with appropriate remedies to resolve Live Nation’s monopoly, potentially including a breakup.“Divestiture, it’s the nuclear option”Bonta said the states’ breakup request, expected to be formally submitted this week, may go beyond a separation of Live Nation and Ticketmaster. They’re also considering asking for at least partial divestitures of parts of Live Nation’s venue or artist management businesses. “Divestiture, it’s the nuclear option. We believe it’s warranted, but we want to be thoughtful how we ask this judge for an appropriate remedy,” he told reporters.“Opinions shared yesterday misrepresent how the live events industry operates,” Live Nation’s executive vice president of corporate and regulatory affairs, Dan Wall, said in a statement. “Secondary ticketing and high-demand onsales are industry-wide challenges that exist across every promoter, venue, and ticketing platform. That’s precisely why Live Nation and Ticketmaster have long supported industry-wide resale reform, including price caps and stronger consumer protections, while continuing to invest in tools that help artists manage demand and protect fans.”Live Nation haspromised to appealthe jury verdict, and even before it does it’s possible the judge will deny the states the full extent of the remedies they ask for. But Monday’s forum showed tha